PacSun – AI Citation Intelligence Snapshot

PacSun – AI Citation Intelligence Snapshot

Competitive Visibility Analysis Across AI Platforms
25 queries tested | 4 platforms analyzed | November 6, 2025

Key Performance Metrics

Competitive Ranking
#14 of 31
Third-party citations in unbranded queries. Leader: Nike (226 citations)
Visibility Score
13%
Organic mention rate across all 100 tests (13 of 100). All queries are unbranded.
Third-Party Citations
69
Citations from editorial, social, and business media sources
Top Competitor
Nike
Gap: +157 third-party citations vs PacSun's 69
Editorial Media Gaps
6
Major fashion/youth media outlets with zero PacSun visibility

Executive Summary

Competitive Position: PacSun ranks #14 of 31 youth fashion competitors in organic AI visibility, with 69 third-party citations across 100 tests (13% overall mention rate). Nike leads with 226 third-party citations, representing a gap of 157 citations.

Editorial Lane Performance: PacSun shows strongest visibility in Mall Culture queries (45% mention rate, 9/20 tests), demonstrating established positioning in physical retail discovery. However, significant opportunity exists in Purpose & Values (0%), Social Commerce/Creator Culture (0%), and Youth Culture Leadership (5%) lanes - categories that define next-generation fashion brand relevance.

Strategic Opportunity: Analysis reveals 7 major editorial media outlets (Vogue, Teen Vogue, Harper's Bazaar, Complex, Refinery29) citing competitors but not PacSun, representing high-priority relationship gaps in fashion and youth media. Platform performance is developing across all AI services, with Perplexity showing highest visibility (20%) but no platform reaching the 25% threshold for strong organic presence.

This snapshot provides a foundation for competitive positioning strategy. The contrast between strong mall culture presence and limited visibility in digital-native/values-driven categories suggests specific opportunities for content optimization and thought leadership positioning.

Competitive Landscape

Third-party citation frequency in unbranded queries. Excludes brand official and competitor official websites.

#1 Nike 226 citations
100% (Leader)
#2 H&M 195 citations
86.3% of leader
#3 Zara 167 citations
73.9% of leader
#4 Asos 162 citations
71.7% of leader
#5 American Eagle 148 citations
65.5% of leader
#14 PacSun 69 citations
30.5% of leader

Editorial Lane Performance

Performance across 5 strategic editorial categories defined in PacSun's content strategy.

Editorial Lane Tests Mention Rate Assessment
Mall Culture & Where to Shop 20 45.0% (9/20) Moderate
Trend & Seasonal Culture 20 15.0% (3/20) Developing
Youth Culture & Identity 20 5.0% (1/20) Opportunity
Purpose, Identity & Values 20 0.0% (0/20) Opportunity
TikTok Shop & Social Commerce 20 0.0% (0/20) Opportunity

Platform Analysis

PacSun visibility across 4 major AI platforms. 25 tests per platform.

Perplexity
20%
5 of 25 tests
Highest visibility
Gemini
16%
4 of 25 tests
Second highest
ChatGPT
8%
2 of 25 tests
Developing
Claude
8%
2 of 25 tests
Developing

Media Landscape

Youth and fashion media analysis showing current PacSun coverage vs. competitive citation opportunities.

Top Editorial Media Citing PacSun

News, fashion, and business media outlets (excluding social platforms, retailers, and consulting firms)

Media Outlet Type PacSun Mentions Competitor-Only
retaildive.com Business 5 9
businessoffashion.com Business 5 15
forbes.com Business 3 25
seventeen.com Youth 3 1
voguebusiness.com Fashion 2 9
businessinsider.com Business 2 19
hypebeast.com Youth 2 6
vogue.com Fashion 1 15
whowhatwear.com Fashion 1 9
wwd.com Trade 1 4
fashionista.com Fashion 1 4
gq.com Fashion 1 2

Note on social media: YouTube and TikTok each show 5 competitor-only citations with 0 PacSun mentions. Reddit, LinkedIn, Wikipedia, Instagram show zero citations. AI platforms strongly prefer editorial sources over social media for fashion queries.

Priority Editorial Media Opportunities

News, fashion, and business media citing competitors but NOT PacSun

Media Outlet Type PacSun Competitor Citations
teenvogue.com Youth 0 9
harpersbazaar.com Fashion 0 7
nytimes.com News 0 5
elle.com Fashion 0 3
refinery29.com Youth 0 3
complex.com Youth 0 3

Excluded from this analysis: Corporate/brand sites (McKinsey, Patagonia, ThredUp, Target) and social platforms (YouTube, TikTok have 5 competitor citations each but limited strategic value for editorial PR).

Strategic Considerations

Content & Positioning Opportunities

1. Youth Culture Authority Gap

Observation: 5% visibility (1/20 tests) in Youth Culture Leadership queries, compared to 45% in Mall Culture. Competitors like Urban Outfitters, Nike, and Shein dominate "Gen Z fashion leadership" positioning.

Opportunity: Develop thought leadership content positioning PacSun executives as Gen Z culture experts. Priority editorial outlets with zero PacSun visibility include Teen Vogue (9 competitor citations), Complex (3 citations), and Refinery29 (3 citations) - all critical youth culture publications.

Measurement: Track quarterly visibility in youth culture queries; target 20%+ mention rate within 6 months.

2. Social Commerce & Creator Positioning

Observation: Zero visibility (0/20 tests) in TikTok Shop, creator culture, and social commerce queries despite PacSun's digital presence. This represents the fastest-growing discovery channel for Gen Z fashion.

Opportunity: Amplify creator partnerships, TikTok Shop initiatives, and social commerce strategy through PR and owned content. Document and share creator collaboration case studies that AI platforms can reference.

Measurement: Achieve 15%+ visibility in social commerce queries within 3 months of content strategy implementation.

3. Purpose & Values Narrative

Observation: Zero visibility in Purpose, Identity & Values queries while competitors increasingly own sustainability and youth empowerment positioning in AI responses.

Opportunity: Develop comprehensive ESG, community impact, and youth empowerment content strategy. Position initiatives in formats optimized for AI citation (press releases, impact reports, owned blog content).

Measurement: Target 10%+ visibility in values-driven queries by Q2 2026.

4. Platform-Specific Optimization

Observation: Perplexity shows 2.5x better visibility (20%) than ChatGPT/Claude (8%). No platform reaches the 25% threshold for strong organic presence.

Opportunity: Study Perplexity's content preferences and citation patterns. Test content optimization across all platforms with focus on structured data, authoritative sources, and fresh content signals.

Measurement: Achieve 25%+ on at least 2 platforms within 6 months; track monthly platform-by-platform performance.

Complete Query Appendix

Interactive view of all 100 tests. Filter and search to explore specific queries, categories, or platforms.

Showing 100 of 100 tests
Query Category Platform PacSun Mentioned Competitors

Methodology & Limitations

Study Design & Parameters

Overview: This analysis represents a snapshot based on 25 unbranded queries tested across 4 AI platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) on November 6, 2025. All queries test organic competitive positioning without explicit brand mentions. Results provide directional insights for strategic positioning.

Query Design: 25 unbranded queries across 5 editorial lanes (youth culture, purpose/values, seasonal trends, social commerce, mall culture), testing organic competitive positioning without brand name mentions. 5 queries per category × 4 platforms = 100 total tests.

Platforms Tested: ChatGPT (GPT-4), Claude (Sonnet), Perplexity (default), Gemini (default). Conducted November 6, 2025 from U.S. location.

Citation Analysis: 950 citations captured and classified across brand official, competitor official (31 major fashion retailers including Nike, H&M, Zara, Uniqlo, Target, Gap, Levi's, and 24 others), youth media, fashion media, business media, social media, and retail categories. Each citation classified by domain type and analyzed for brand vs. competitor mentions.

Competitive Ranking Methodology: Rankings based exclusively on third-party citations (excluding brand and competitor official websites) in unbranded queries. This isolates editorial influence rather than owned content visibility.

Important Limitations

  • Temporal: Single point in time snapshot (November 6, 2025). Not longitudinal tracking. AI algorithms update continuously.
  • Sample Size: 25 queries provide directional insights but are not comprehensive. Quarterly tracking with 40-60 queries recommended for trend analysis.
  • Query Phrasing: Results highly sensitive to exact query formulation. Different phrasings may yield different results.
  • Algorithm Evolution: AI platforms update algorithms continuously. Today's results may not predict tomorrow's performance.
  • Geographic Variability: Results based on U.S. queries. International markets may differ significantly.
  • Citation Limits: Analysis captures top citations per response, not exhaustive source lists. Citations limited to what AI platforms chose to display.
  • Classification Logic: Domain classifications use rules-based logic. Manual review recommended for strategic planning.
  • Competitive Intelligence: All queries are unbranded, testing pure competitive positioning. Does not measure branded search performance or direct navigation.

This snapshot provides a foundation for AEO/GEO strategy. For comprehensive analysis and trend identification, consider quarterly tracking with expanded query sets (40-60 queries across 6-8 categories) to measure optimization impact over time.